<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An argument for fully engineered post-frame buildings</title>
	<atom:link href="/frame-building-news/an-argument-for-fully-engineered-post-frame-buildings/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.constructionmagnet.com/frame-building-news/an-argument-for-fully-engineered-post-frame-buildings</link>
	<description>Construction Magazine Network is the online home of Rural Builder, Metal Roofing Magazine,  Frame Building News, the Idea Book,  Gutter Opportunities, and Wood Homes Industry News.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 19:04:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: john miguel</title>
		<link>http://www.constructionmagnet.com/frame-building-news/an-argument-for-fully-engineered-post-frame-buildings#comment-3553</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john miguel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 20:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constructionmagnet.com/?p=17077#comment-3553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am impressed about this article, but yet, I want to research more about these facts.

Could you tell me where in the IBC 2006 that mentions about non-engineered buildings is valid on certain structures (such as agriculture)?

Thank you]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am impressed about this article, but yet, I want to research more about these facts.</p>
<p>Could you tell me where in the IBC 2006 that mentions about non-engineered buildings is valid on certain structures (such as agriculture)?</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Momb</title>
		<link>http://www.constructionmagnet.com/frame-building-news/an-argument-for-fully-engineered-post-frame-buildings#comment-3338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Momb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 18:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constructionmagnet.com/?p=17077#comment-3338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David&#039;s article is right on the money.

After over three decades in the post frame industry, my personal observation is we are yet plagued by the not engineered &quot;lumber yard kit&quot;, the builder who, &quot;we&#039;ve built them this way for years&quot; and even the large &quot;reputable&quot; builders who provide non-engineered buildings which they claim to be &quot;robust&quot;, however do not meet the code load requirements. 

Even in building jurisdictions which require permits, do plan reviews and construction inspections - problems occur, or are caused by the building departments themselves. Many offer &quot;prescriptive requirements&quot; for non-engineered post frame buildings which are not code conforming, and in some cases could lead to catastrophic building failures. 

The real solution is for every building, whether post frame or otherwise, to be designed by a registered design professional - specific to the building to be constructed, at the site the building is to be constructed at.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David&#8217;s article is right on the money.</p>
<p>After over three decades in the post frame industry, my personal observation is we are yet plagued by the not engineered &#8220;lumber yard kit&#8221;, the builder who, &#8220;we&#8217;ve built them this way for years&#8221; and even the large &#8220;reputable&#8221; builders who provide non-engineered buildings which they claim to be &#8220;robust&#8221;, however do not meet the code load requirements. </p>
<p>Even in building jurisdictions which require permits, do plan reviews and construction inspections &#8211; problems occur, or are caused by the building departments themselves. Many offer &#8220;prescriptive requirements&#8221; for non-engineered post frame buildings which are not code conforming, and in some cases could lead to catastrophic building failures. </p>
<p>The real solution is for every building, whether post frame or otherwise, to be designed by a registered design professional &#8211; specific to the building to be constructed, at the site the building is to be constructed at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.constructionmagnet.com/frame-building-news/an-argument-for-fully-engineered-post-frame-buildings#comment-2561</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen Keith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 14:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constructionmagnet.com/?p=17077#comment-2561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been &quot;preaching&quot; this for years!  Although as thorough as this article! This article not only Covers the problems, it proves the case and has a common sense solution!!

Great article!
Thanks

Steve Keith
National Sales Manager
Stockade Buildings Inc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been &#8220;preaching&#8221; this for years!  Although as thorough as this article! This article not only Covers the problems, it proves the case and has a common sense solution!!</p>
<p>Great article!<br />
Thanks</p>
<p>Steve Keith<br />
National Sales Manager<br />
Stockade Buildings Inc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 616/630 objects using apc

 Served from: www.constructionmagnet.com @ 2015-12-20 23:57:20 by W3 Total Cache -->